Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 25 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 25 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Rodney Charles Cuthbert

For Trial
Angela Dolly Crozier

In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Jason Charles Dare

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
Garry Scott Sullivan
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 am
For Trial
Alicia Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Olasupo Ayodeji Owoeye

To follow
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Shane Vivian Smith

4:00pm For Sentencing Submissions
CLL

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (part heard)
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Samantha Jane Whish-Wilson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Alicia Masters v Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg was heard. The plaintiff, Alicia Masters, brought the action against the defendants, Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg, with the case being heard before Justice Pearce. The nature of the dispute pertains to a civil matter, likely involving contractual or property-related issues, given the context of the proceeding.

The court was tasked with determining the legal issues surrounding the dispute. Specifically, the court needed to assess the validity of the claims made by the plaintiff and the defences presented by the defendants. This involved an examination of the contractual terms, any breaches, and the extent of damages or remedies sought by the plaintiff. The court also had to consider any procedural matters, such as the admissibility of evidence and the application of legal principles to the facts of the case.

Justice Pearce delivered a detailed judgment on the matter, providing a comprehensive analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented. The court found in favour of the plaintiff, Alicia Masters, and awarded her the relief sought. The judgment detailed the reasoning behind the court's decision, including the interpretation of relevant legal principles and the application of these to the specific facts of the case. The outcome was a significant win for the plaintiff, ensuring that the defendants were held accountable for their actions.

The final orders of the court, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, would likely include a monetary award to the plaintiff, as well as any other remedies deemed appropriate by the court. The decision sets an important precedent for similar cases in the future, highlighting the court's approach to contractual disputes and the enforcement of legal rights.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established