Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 25 June 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 25 JUNE 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Ronnie Edward Jackson
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Joseph Michael Tullo
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court
10.00am For Mention
Jason Robert Burns

For Trial
Clinton Michael Maher

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30 a.m. For Trial (Part Heard)

Darrel Francis Saward

10.00 a.m. For Mention
DJS

For Plea
Ben Richard Burgess

For Trial
Kim Gregory White

2.15 p.m. For Sentence
Lee Shane Fenning

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, has a diverse array of criminal and civil cases scheduled for 25 June 2013. In Hobart, Justice ESTCOURT will preside over a criminal trial involving Ronnie Edward Jackson, while Justice PEARCE will handle a part-heard trial for Joseph Michael Tullo. Associate Justice HOLT will address miscellaneous civil business. In Launceston, Justice Tennent will oversee a criminal mention involving Jason Robert Burns and a part-heard trial for Clinton Michael Maher. In Burnie, Justice Wood will manage a criminal trial for Darrel Francis Saward, a plea for DJS, and a trial for Ben Richard Burgess, with sentencing for Kim Gregory White scheduled for later in the afternoon. The cases involve various legal matters, including criminal charges and civil disputes.

The court was required to address multiple legal issues, including the determination of guilt or innocence in criminal cases, the resolution of civil disputes, and the application of relevant laws and precedents to the facts of each case. For the criminal trials, the court had to assess the evidence presented, apply the applicable legal standards, and determine whether the prosecution had proven the charges beyond reasonable doubt. In civil cases, the court needed to interpret the relevant laws, assess the evidence, and make a decision based on the merits of the case.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. For criminal cases, the court will consider the evidence and arguments from both the prosecution and the defence, applying the relevant legal principles to determine whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the charges. In civil cases, the court will assess the evidence and arguments from both parties, interpreting the relevant laws and applying them to the facts of the case to make a decision on the merits. The outcomes will vary based on the strength of the evidence and the application of the law to the specific circumstances of each case.

The final orders of the court will be communicated to the parties involved in each case, outlining the court's decisions and any relevant penalties, fines, or other remedies. These orders will be based on the court's findings of fact and application of the law, and will be binding on the parties involved. The specific details of the court's orders will depend on the outcomes of each case and the legal issues that were addressed.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established