Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 24 September 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 24 SEPTEMBER 2013

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.

By Video-Link From Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Application to Review Suspended Sentence
Jared Joseph Broadby

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Zeb Judge Hovington

4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Brodie John Self
Riccardo Mladenich

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
J V-A

For Plea
David John Charles King
Luke William Garth

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Paul Andrew Jackson

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Thomson & Anor
v
Perkins & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
PTB

4.15pm For Application to Review Suspended Sentence by video-link to Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jared Joseph Broadby

BURNIE

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was occupied with several cases on Tuesday, 24 September 2013, involving both criminal and civil matters. Notable among these was a case involving Jared Joseph Broadby, who was the subject of an application to review a suspended sentence. This application was conducted via video-link from the Supreme Court in Launceston to the Hobart Supreme Court. Another criminal matter involved Zeb Judge Hovington, who was scheduled for trial in Hobart. Additionally, Brodie John Self and Riccardo Mladenich were to appear for a bail application, also in Hobart. The civil docket included miscellaneous business and a directions hearing for a case involving Thomson & Anor versus Perkins & Ors, which was to be heard in Launceston.

The legal issues presented to the court ranged from the review of sentencing decisions and the granting of bail to the conduct of trials and the management of civil disputes. In the case of Jared Joseph Broadby, the court needed to assess whether the original sentence was appropriate and whether the circumstances had changed sufficiently to warrant a review. For Zeb Judge Hovington, the trial would address the specific charges brought against him, requiring the court to ensure a fair trial and the proper application of the law. The bail application for Brodie John Self and Riccardo Mladenich would involve considerations of flight risk, the seriousness of the charges, and the potential impact on the community. Civil matters, such as the miscellaneous business and the directions hearing, would involve procedural and substantive legal issues pertinent to the specific cases.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not provided in the excerpt, but the court's approach would likely involve a detailed examination of the evidence, legal principles, and the rights of the parties involved. The court's decisions on these matters would be guided by the relevant statutes, case law, and judicial discretion. The final orders and outcomes of the cases would be communicated in subsequent documentation or court filings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established