Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 24 May 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 24 MAY 2016

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

11:00 a.m.

For Hearing

Stephen Roy Standage

State of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Jenny Branch-Allen
v
Barry Easther and Lynn Mason

(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous civil business

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's law lists for Tuesday, 24 May 2016, feature several hearings and trials scheduled for the day. One of the significant cases involves Stephen Roy Standage versus the State of Tasmania, which is listed for a part-heard hearing in Court 1. This case likely involves criminal matters, as it is heard in the Court of Criminal Appeal before the court's judges. Another case involves Jenny Branch-Allen versus Barry Easther and Lynn Mason, which is also part-heard and involves civil jurisdiction in Court 7. These hearings suggest that the court is addressing complex legal issues, potentially related to criminal or civil disputes, requiring careful consideration and deliberation by the judges.

The legal issues in these cases likely encompass a range of matters, from the interpretation of criminal statutes and procedures in Standage v. State of Tasmania to the resolution of civil disputes in Branch-Allen v. Easther and Mason. The court must navigate the specifics of each case, ensuring that the proceedings comply with legal standards and that the rights of the parties are upheld. The part-heard nature of these cases indicates that the hearings are at an intermediate stage, with further sessions possibly required to reach a final decision.

The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases will depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by the parties. In criminal cases, the court must ensure that the prosecution has met the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while in civil cases, the court must determine liability and remedy based on the balance of probabilities. The decisions made by the court in these cases will set important precedents and provide clarity on the relevant legal principles. The final orders will reflect the court's findings and may include judgments, orders for damages, or other remedies as deemed appropriate by the judges.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established