Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 23 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Darren Leigh White

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Application
TJP

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Matthew Kent Goodman

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Graeme Edwards
V

Tasmanian Mines Limited

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Toby Lloyd George

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Legal Profession Board of Tasmania has brought an application against a legal practitioner before Justice Tennent in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the application is not explicitly stated in the provided text. The court's task is to determine the appropriate legal issues arising from this application, which may pertain to professional conduct, discipline, or other matters related to the legal practitioner's practice.

The court was required to consider the specific legal matters presented by the application. These may include allegations of professional misconduct, breaches of ethical standards, or other issues pertinent to the legal practitioner's practice. The court had to review the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, apply relevant legal principles, and make a decision based on the facts and law.

The court deliberated on the application and provided its reasoning and outcome. Justice Tennent considered the evidence and arguments presented by the Legal Profession Board and the legal practitioner. After careful analysis, the court reached a decision based on the merits of the case and applicable legal standards. The specific outcome of the decision is not detailed in the provided text, but it would involve either upholding or dismissing the application, along with any necessary orders or directives.

If needed, a fourth paragraph would detail any final orders or directives issued by the court. These may include sanctions, disciplinary actions, or other measures deemed appropriate in light of the court's decision. However, such details are not provided in the given text.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established