Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 23 April 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 23 APRIL 2013

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Disputed Facts Hearing

Meaganne Glover

3.30 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

Bail Application

Leonard Riley

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Daniel Luke Pelham

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Cameron James Riley

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania had several matters listed for hearing on Tuesday, 23 April 2013. In the criminal jurisdiction, Meaganne Glover had a disputed facts hearing scheduled at 10:00 AM in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, presided over by Justice Wood. This hearing likely dealt with determining factual disputes in an ongoing criminal case. Another criminal matter involved Leonard Riley, who had a bail application scheduled at 3:30 PM in Court 7, also in Hobart, presided over by the same Justice Wood. In the civil jurisdiction, Associate Justice Holt was assigned to a miscellaneous civil business case at 9:30 AM in Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart. Additionally, in the criminal jurisdiction at 2:15 PM in Court 7, Justice Estcourt presided over the sentencing of Daniel Luke Pelham.

The legal issues in these cases varied, focusing on the resolution of disputed facts in Meaganne Glover's case, the assessment of bail eligibility for Leonard Riley, and the handling of civil business by Associate Justice Holt. The court also addressed the sentencing of Daniel Luke Pelham, which would involve determining the appropriate punishment based on the crime and other relevant factors. Each matter required careful consideration of the applicable laws and legal principles to ensure a fair and just outcome.

The court's reasoning and outcomes in these cases were not detailed in the document, but each hearing would have involved a thorough examination of the relevant facts, legal arguments, and precedents. Meaganne Glover's disputed facts hearing would have focused on resolving specific factual disputes that were contested. Leonard Riley's bail application would have involved assessing his risk of flight, reoffending, or interfering with witnesses. The civil business handled by Associate Justice Holt would have addressed various civil matters, likely requiring the application of civil procedure rules and substantive law. Finally, Daniel Luke Pelham's sentencing would have considered the nature of his crime, his criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The outcomes would have been determined based on the evidence and arguments presented during the respective hearings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established