SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 22 MAY 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Bryan Peter Connolly
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Leigh John Quinn
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m. For Trial
Ryan Gregory Cecil Betts
4.00 p.m. For Mention
Tanya Maree Howard
Zannon Tony Howard
For Plea
Kurt Kerry Jackson
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 22 May 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 86
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 86
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues presented in these cases encompassed a range of criminal charges and civil disputes. Bryan Peter Connolly's trial dealt with specific allegations that required adjudication under criminal law, while Leigh John Quinn's plea involved a resolution of criminal charges through a formal admission of guilt. The civil matters heard by Associate Justice Holt likely involved a variety of disputes such as contract breaches, property disputes, or personal injury claims. The Burnie court's proceedings involved the trial of Ryan Gregory Cecil Betts and the mention of Tanya Maree Howard, which might have included bail applications or updates on ongoing cases. Lastly, Kurt Kerry Jackson's plea dealt with a criminal matter, likely involving an admission of guilt or a negotiated plea.
The reasoning and outcome of the court proceedings were not detailed in the provided extract. The court would have considered the evidence presented, legal arguments from both parties, and applicable laws to reach its decisions. Justice Evans, Justice Blow, and Associate Justice Holt would have individually addressed the specific issues in their respective cases, ensuring that the legal principles were correctly applied. Justice Wood in Burnie would have similarly presided over the criminal trial and mention, ensuring due process was followed for Betts and Howard. The final orders, which would have included sentencing, bail conditions, or directions for further legal action, were not specified in the document.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.