Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 20 November 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 20 NOVEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Full Court
9.45 a.m.
For Judgment
Robert John Foster

v
Geoffrey Lyndon Archer by his litigation guardian Pamela Ann Archer

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Darryl Howlin
v
Clarence City Council

(Part- Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Launceston

Mark Leonard Thomas

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by Telephone
Henki Bire
Sulaiman Bin Marhaban
Safrudin Wotu

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Melissa Jane Woolley

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4.00 p.m.
For Mention by telephone
Corbett
v
Migliorini

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford by video-link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Mark Leonard Thomas

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Tuesday, 20 November 2012, the Supreme Court of Tasmania had various cases scheduled across different courts in Hobart and Launceston. A notable case was Robert John Foster versus Geoffrey Lyndon Archer by his litigation guardian Pamela Ann Archer, which was listed for judgment before the Full Court in Hobart. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the court list, but it was set for judgment at 10:00 a.m. Another significant case was Darryl Howlin versus Clarence City Council, which was partially heard in Court 7, also in Hobart. This case was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. before Chief Justice Crawford.

The legal issues to be determined by the court in Foster versus Archer could include those related to litigation guardianship, the rights and obligations of a litigation guardian, and any specific claims or defenses presented by the parties. In the case of Howlin versus Clarence City Council, the court would have been required to address issues related to the claims brought by Howlin against the council, which could involve matters such as local government liability, public law issues, or contractual disputes. The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases would have been based on the evidence and legal arguments presented by the parties, as well as the applicable laws and precedents.

The court's decision in these cases would have been communicated through written judgments or orders, which were not detailed in the provided court list. The outcomes would have resolved the disputes between the parties based on the legal principles applied by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established