SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 2 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
For Application for Bail Variation
DGH
For Application for Severance
David Ian Charles Coles
Derek Michael Crosswell
Jay John Bradford
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Michael McCarthy and Eleni Margaritis
v
Vos Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd and Luke de Vries
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am for Plea
Benjamin David Howard
Gunnaid Anding Taher Ford
2.15pm for Mention
Christopher John Glen Walker
Trent Philip Tuthill
Toby Lloyd George
4pm for Mention by Video Link to the Risdon Prison Complex
Joshua Paul Birtwistle
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Nicholas Mark Anderson
For Trial
Adam James Orme
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 2 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 177
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 177
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in the cases heard by the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 2 September 2014 were varied. In the criminal cases, the issues included bail variation and severance, as well as pleas and mentions. In the civil cases, the issues were not specified in the document, but may have included disputes related to contract, tort, or property law. In the case of McCarthy and Margaritis v Vos Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd and Luke de Vries, the specific legal issues were not stated.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania's reasoning and outcome in the cases heard on 2 September 2014 are not specified in the document. The court would have considered the evidence and arguments presented by the parties in each case and made a decision based on the law applicable to the issues raised. The outcome may have included orders for bail variation or severance, pleas being accepted or denied, or judgments being entered in the civil cases. In the case of McCarthy and Margaritis v Vos Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd and Luke de Vries, the specific outcome was not stated.
No final orders were mentioned in the document. However, it is likely that the court made orders in each case based on the evidence and arguments presented. The orders may have included bail variation or severance, pleas being accepted or denied, or judgments being entered in the civil cases. In the case of McCarthy and Margaritis v Vos Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd and Luke de Vries, the specific orders were not stated.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.