Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 2 December 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 2 DECEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness
Aaron John Stebbings

For Plea
Ornella Mirella Santesso

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Application
Nicole Maree McGowan

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Darryl Scott Donohue

10:00am For Facts and Sentence
Coby Wells

4:00pm For Sentence
Nicholas Mark Bull

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Tara Jayne Stokes

(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on Tuesday, 2 December 2014, featuring several criminal and civil cases. One notable case was Paul Francis Allison versus Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and others, which was part-heard in Court 1 before Associate Justice Holt. This case involved a civil dispute, likely concerning business or contractual matters, given the involvement of multiple parties, including a private limited company. The other cases on the list involved various criminal proceedings, such as pleas, applications, and trials, all of which were scheduled for different times and courts across Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie.

The legal issues in the case of Paul Francis Allison versus Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and others encompassed the interpretation and application of contract law, potentially including questions about breach of contract, damages, and the enforceability of agreements. The court would have needed to consider evidence and arguments from both parties to determine the rights and obligations of the involved parties. The outcome of this case would have significant implications for the parties' future business dealings and potentially set a precedent for similar cases in Tasmania.

The court's reasoning and outcome for this case were not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, given the nature of the case and the proceedings, the court would have thoroughly examined the presented evidence and legal arguments before reaching a decision. The final orders of the court, which would outline the specific findings and any remedies or penalties imposed, were not provided in the document. These orders would be crucial for the parties to understand their legal position and the next steps they need to take.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established