Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 17 September 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Karena Joi Mundy
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
MDM
SWDM
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Paul Andrew Jackson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
3:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation Pty Ltd
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Michael Vernon Lowe

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of cases across different jurisdictions on 17 September 2013. Among the cases was one concerning Karena Joi Mundy, which was scheduled for trial in Court 7 at 10:00 a.m. Another case, involving MDMSWDM, was set for trial in Court 8 at 9:15 a.m. The court also had a mention scheduled for Paul Andrew Jackson at 4:00 p.m. in Court 1. The court's civil jurisdiction was exercised in two cases: one involving a judgment for Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation Pty Ltd against the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal, set for 3:00 p.m. in Court 2, and miscellaneous civil business at 9:30 a.m. in the same court. Launceston's court had a trial for Michael Vernon Lowe at 10:00 a.m. in Court 1, while Burnie had no listed cases.

The legal issues in the cases varied. The criminal cases involved trials for Karena Joi Mundy and Michael Vernon Lowe, which would require the court to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants based on the evidence presented. The case concerning MDMSWDM would also involve similar determinations. The mention for Paul Andrew Jackson would likely address procedural matters or updates in his case. The civil case between the Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation Pty Ltd and the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal involved disputes related to resource management and planning, potentially including issues of statutory interpretation, administrative law, and the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The court's reasoning and outcomes in these cases were not detailed in the provided excerpt, and the final orders were not specified. The Launceston court's trial for Michael Vernon Lowe would proceed based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, with the court making a determination based on the law applicable to the criminal charges. The civil case involving the Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation and the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal would have required the court to consider detailed legal arguments and possibly review administrative decisions made by the tribunal.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established