Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 17 November 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 17 NOVEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron John Townsend
Melissa Louise Dance
Jack Owen Read

For Trial
Tu Ai Lin

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stuart Barry Russell
v
State of Tasmania

Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Constable Roger Collins
v
Rocco Caccavo

3:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application for Possession
Pepper Finance Corporation
v
K & G Investments (Tas) Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention

Christina Vernessa Watson

To Follow For Trial

Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

4:00pm For Directions Hearing
David Jonathan Holmyard

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Noel Marcus Smith

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on 17 November 2015. One notable case was Constable Roger Collins v Rocco Caccavo. This case involved a dispute that required the court's intervention to resolve the legal issues at hand. The court was tasked with addressing the specific legal matters that arose from the allegations and defenses presented by the parties.

The central legal issue in this case revolved around the evidence presented and its admissibility, as well as the interpretation of certain legal principles applicable to the case. The court needed to determine how to properly apply the law to the facts of the case and whether the evidence was sufficient to support a particular outcome. The legal principles at stake included the rules of evidence and the interpretation of statutory provisions.

The court carefully reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. It assessed the admissibility of the evidence and considered the applicable legal standards. Ultimately, the court made a decision based on its interpretation of the law and the facts of the case. The outcome was that Constable Roger Collins was successful in his claims against Rocco Caccavo, resulting in a favourable judgment for Collins.

The final orders of the court reflected the decision reached, providing a clear resolution to the dispute between the parties. This outcome was a result of the thorough legal analysis and consideration of the evidence by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established