Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 17 March 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 17 MARCH 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Nathan Grant Chatters
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Sentence
Ornella Mirella Santesso

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Paul Victor Marshall

For Trial
Christopher Paul Minehan
(Part Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Tiyana Lyn Gunn
Jess Harrison
Patrick John Wilcox

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Troy Leslie Eirth
v
Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Leigh Mathew Bourke

For Trial
Glenn Paul Watts

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was set to hear several cases on Tuesday, 17 March 2015. In Court 7 at Salamanca Place in Hobart, Chief Justice Blow presided over a criminal trial involving Nathan Grant Chatters, which was partially heard that day. Court 8, also in Salamanca Place, Hobart, saw Justice Porter preside over sentencing for Ornella Mirella Santesso and a mention for Paul Victor Marshall via video-link from Risdon Prison Complex. Further down the schedule, Justice Porter also heard sentencing for Tiyana Lyn Gunn, Jess Harrison, and Patrick John Wilcox. In the civil division, Justice ESTCOURT presided over a partially heard trial between Troy Leslie Eirth and Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. Associate Justice HOLT handled miscellaneous civil business in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. In Launceston, Justice PEARCE heard a partially heard trial for Marco Daniel Rusterholz in Court 1 at Cameron Street, while in Burnie, Criminal Jurisdiction heard a bail consent application for Leigh Mathew Bourke in Court 1 at Alexander Street. Glenn Paul Watts was scheduled for trial.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed various aspects of criminal and civil law. In the criminal trials, the court needed to determine guilt or innocence, the appropriate penalties for those found guilty, and whether bail should be granted or denied. In the civil trial, the court was tasked with resolving disputes between private parties and deciding on the application of the law to the facts presented. Each case involved the interpretation and application of statutory provisions, case law, and potentially, the consideration of mitigating or aggravating factors in sentencing.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's reasoning and outcomes for the cases would have been guided by relevant statutes, precedents, and the principles of natural justice. The court would have considered the evidence presented, the legal arguments from both sides, and the applicable laws to reach its decisions. For criminal cases, the court would have determined whether the prosecution had proven the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and if so, the appropriate sentence based on the severity of the offence and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. In civil cases, the court would have assessed the merits of the claims and defences, applying the relevant legal standards to arrive at a just resolution.

The final orders of the court would have been communicated to the parties involved, reflecting the outcomes of the hearings and any subsequent decisions made by the judges. These orders would have been communicated directly to the accused in criminal cases, outlining the sentences and any other legal consequences, and to the parties in civil cases, detailing the court's decisions on the claims and any remedies awarded.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established