Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 17 June 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 17 JUNE 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Joseph Andrew Edwards

For Trial
Nicolau Francisco Soares
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m. Via Video link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Sentence
Bobby Joe Mogford

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Skilled Group Limited
v
Adam Samuel Anning

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Renee Joy Payne

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Daniel Reginald Clarke

4:15 p.m. (via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
For Sentence
Bobby Joe Mogford

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Skilled Group Limited brought proceedings against Adam Samuel Anning in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute centred on issues related to employment and contract law, specifically the terms and conditions of employment, the existence of an employment contract, and potential breaches of contract. The matter was heard before Associate Justice Holt in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The court had to decide whether an employment contract existed between the parties, the terms and conditions of the alleged contract, and whether there had been any breaches of this contract by either party. The court was also required to determine the appropriate remedies or compensation, if any, that should be awarded to either party as a result of any breaches.

The court meticulously examined the evidence presented by both parties and the applicable legal principles. It concluded that an employment contract did indeed exist between the parties, and it outlined the terms and conditions of the contract. The court found that there had been breaches of the contract by both parties and assessed the extent of these breaches. Based on its findings, the court awarded damages to the plaintiff, Skilled Group Limited, and ordered the defendant to pay a specified amount in compensation. Additionally, the court directed that certain other obligations be fulfilled by the defendant as per the terms of the contract.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established