Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 15 July 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 15 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Timothy James Ellis
v
Kelly Cordwell

2:15 p.m.
For Application
Jay John Bradford

For Plea
Hishan Almanaa

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Porter presided over a hearing involving Timothy James Ellis, who filed a claim against Kelly Cordwell. The nature of the dispute centred around a legal matter that necessitated a directions hearing. This hearing aimed to outline the procedural steps that the case would follow and to ensure that both parties were clear on the forthcoming processes.

The court was tasked with determining the procedural issues that needed to be addressed to facilitate a fair and efficient resolution of the dispute. This involved assessing the nature of the evidence required, the scope of discovery, and any potential issues that might arise during the trial. The court had to ensure that the process adhered to the legal standards and that both parties had an opportunity to present their cases effectively.

Justice Porter provided detailed directions, outlining the steps necessary to proceed with the case. The court emphasised the importance of timely submissions and adherence to the procedural rules. Ultimately, the hearing resulted in a clear direction for the parties to follow, ensuring that the case could progress towards a resolution. The final orders included directives for both parties to file specific documents by certain dates and to attend further hearings as scheduled.

The court's decision facilitated a structured approach to the litigation process, ensuring that the case could be resolved efficiently while maintaining fairness and due process. The final orders were designed to keep the litigation process on track and to avoid any unnecessary delays.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established