Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 June 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 119


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 14 JUNE 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Patrick Farnell
Benjamin Angus Shield
Jamie Leigh Feil

10.15 a.m.
For Trial
Melissa Louise Dance

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court
For Mention
Damian D’Ettore
Trent Aaron Gordon
Lai Le
JBH

For Bail Consent
John William Laurence Fiddler

For Trial
George Syrginis

4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
James Fitzgerald

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice TENNENT

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Motion to Review

Nathan Grant Chatters

v

State of Tasmania 

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Christopher Charles Gibson
A Witness
A Witness
Katarzyna Wanda Stadnicka
Shannon Lee Ruffels
Ethen Wayne Nicholls

To Follow
For Trial
Scott Bevan Lucas

4:00pm For Sentence
Mark Paul Phillips

4:15pm For Application to Vary Bail
Jason Robert Burns

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Stephanie Peta Fleming

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
10:00am
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jarrad Christian Robaard
Graham John Ennis
Chad Richard Talbott

To Follow
For Mention
Dean Michael Rowe

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Marshall Pearson Blythe Woolnough

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Timothy Peter Hingston
TME

4:00pm
For Mention
Zoe Lee Griffiths

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Stephanie Peta Fleming

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 June 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 119
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 119
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania provided a list of cases to be heard on June 14, 2016. Various criminal and civil cases were scheduled for mention, trial, and bail applications. In Court 7, Justice Wood presided over criminal cases including a mention for Adrian Patrick Farnell, Benjamin Angus Shield, and Jamie Leigh Feil. Justice Escourt heard cases in Court 8, including bail applications for Damian D’Ettore, Trent Aaron Gordon, and Lai LeJBH, as well as a trial for George Syrginis. Associate Justice Holt handled civil cases in Court 3, including a motion to review by Nathan Grant Chatters against the State of Tasmania. The court lists also detailed various criminal and civil cases to be heard in Launceston and Burnie.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of criminal proceedings, including bail applications, trials, and sentencing. Additionally, there were civil matters such as a motion to review. The cases involved a variety of defendants, each facing different charges and legal challenges. The court's role was to hear the applications and proceedings, make determinations on bail, and manage the trials and other civil matters accordingly.

Justice Wood, Justice Escourt, Associate Justice Holt, and other justices presided over the cases, applying the relevant legal standards and procedures. The outcomes of the bail applications, trials, and motions were determined based on the evidence and arguments presented by the parties involved. The court's decisions aimed to ensure that justice was served in accordance with the law.

The final orders of the court would be communicated to the parties involved, detailing the outcomes of the hearings and any subsequent actions required. The decisions made by the justices would be subject to appeal if any party felt that the outcome was unjust or legally flawed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.