Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 14 February 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Kyle Alan Raymond Giffard
Michael James Milburn

10:30 am
For Trial
Damian Gordon Deeks
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Cameron James Murray
Kristian Clarence McDonald
Bodie Kane Savage

For Sentence
Emma Rosemary Burnett

For Facts and Sentence
Rodney John Hall

For Plea
Adam James Bishop

For Trial
Kyle Ronald Street
Alani Povalu Moeakiola

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin & Ors
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON (as at 4pm on Friday, 10 February 2012)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (part-heard)
Kelly Douglas

4.00pm For Sentence
CO
Reginald Robert Young

BURNIE (as at 4pm on Friday, 10 February 2012)
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00 am
For Trial (part-heard)
JWT

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard before Justice Blow, involving Kyle Alan Raymond Giffard and Michael James Milburn, who were charged with criminal offences. The nature of the dispute pertained to allegations of criminal activity, which required the court to determine the validity of the charges and the appropriate legal outcomes. The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved assessing the evidence presented against the defendants and applying relevant criminal law to reach a verdict.

The court's reasoning was based on a thorough examination of the evidence provided by both the prosecution and the defence. Justice Blow considered the credibility of witnesses, the consistency of testimonies, and the legal standards for criminal liability. The outcome of the proceedings was a decision on the guilt or innocence of the defendants, based on the court's interpretation of the facts and the law. The final orders were communicated in the court's judgment, which detailed the court's findings and the resulting legal consequences for the defendants.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established