Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 November 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2013

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Attorney General for the State of Tasmania
v
Amba Georgina Burgess-Banks

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Decision
IRS

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 pm for Mention

In the Matter of the Legal Profession Act 2007 and in the Matter of an Application by Joanne Frances Matthews

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Amba Georgina Burgess-Banks was listed for hearing before Justice Tennant. The Attorney General for the State of Tasmania brought the matter against Burgess-Banks, indicating a potential criminal case. This hearing was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on 12 November 2013 at Court 7, located at Salamanca Place in Hobart. The legal issues central to this case likely pertain to the alleged criminal conduct of Burgess-Banks and the subsequent response by the state, raising questions about the evidence, legal precedents, and the application of the criminal law in this instance.

The court's reasoning and outcome in this matter would hinge on the interpretation of the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles. Justice Tennant would have assessed the prosecution's case, examined the defence arguments, and applied relevant statutes and case law to determine whether the charges against Burgess-Banks were substantiated. The court's decision would reflect a careful consideration of the facts and legal arguments, aiming to deliver a just outcome based on the evidence and the law.

The final orders of the court would detail the resolution of the case, including any findings of guilt or acquittal, and the corresponding penalties or dispositions. These orders would be a direct result of the court's deliberation and would provide clarity on the legal status of Burgess-Banks following the hearing.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established