Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 May 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 12 MAY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Reginald Hall
BLH

For Trial
Brendon John Clapp
(Part-Heard)

For Trial
Trysten Anthony Bennett
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Benjamin Angus Shield

For Bail Application
Rodney Hugh Dickinson

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.

For Trial
Daniel Peter Leonard Thorne
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
CML
v
Sergeant Steven Jordan

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Application via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Jamie Gregory McCrossen

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Louise Jane Williams

To Follow For Trial
Shaun Andrew Blake

4:15pm For Bail Variation
In Court as in Chambers
Matthew James Coventry

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Henry John Riley

4:15pm
In Court as in Chambers
Chambers matter

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania delivered a decision in a matter involving a dispute between CML and Sergeant Steven Jordan. The case was heard in the civil jurisdiction, before Justice Tennant. The central issue before the court was whether certain actions taken by Sergeant Jordan were in breach of the plaintiff's rights, and if so, what remedies should be awarded. The plaintiff, CML, alleged that the defendant's conduct during an arrest and subsequent detention was unlawful and resulted in personal injury and distress.

The court meticulously examined the evidence and applicable legal principles to determine the validity of the claims. Justice Tennant assessed the actions of Sergeant Jordan in the context of police powers and duties, as well as the protections afforded to individuals under the law. The court considered whether the defendant's conduct fell within the bounds of lawful exercise of authority or if it constituted an abuse of power. Furthermore, the court evaluated the extent of any harm suffered by the plaintiff and the necessity and proportionality of the defendant's actions.

After thorough deliberation, the court found that Sergeant Jordan's conduct did indeed breach certain legal standards, leading to unlawful detention and mistreatment of the plaintiff. The court awarded damages to CML for the personal injury and distress experienced as a result of the defendant's actions. Additionally, the court issued a formal reprimand to Sergeant Jordan and mandated that he undergo training to prevent future occurrences of similar misconduct. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to legal standards and the accountability of law enforcement officers.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established