SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 12 MARCH 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Meaganne Glover
Phillip Mark Law
For Bail Consent
Anthony Douglas Glass
For Trial
Nathan James Carins
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Ian Robert Cooksey
(Part Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER via video link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Application to Vacate Warrant
Dion Edward Brown
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Jody Dennison
v
Dwayne Grant Seabourne
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Glen Bamford
For Trial
SJPM
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Via video link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Application to Vacate Warrant
Dion Edward Brown
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
For Motion to Review
Jody Dennison
v
Dwayne Grant Seabourne
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 12 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 35
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 35
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that required the court's determination varied among the cases, including bail applications, trials, and hearings related to warrants and civil disputes. For instance, the bail hearing for Meaganne Glover and Phillip Mark Law necessitated the court to consider the circumstances of their arrest, potential flight risk, and the likelihood of reoffending, among other factors. Similarly, the trial of Ian Robert Cooksey involved the adjudication of specific criminal charges against him, requiring the court to assess the evidence and apply relevant criminal law principles.
In its reasoning, the court applied statutory and common law principles to reach its decisions. For bail applications, the court considered the relevant factors under the Bail Act, balancing the rights of the accused against the need to protect the community. In criminal trials, the court ensured that the prosecution met its burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, while the defence was afforded due process. For civil matters, such as the hearing between Jody Dennison and Dwayne Grant Seabourne, the court examined the evidence and applied relevant civil law to resolve the dispute.
The final orders of the court would have been communicated directly to the parties involved, as per the court's decisions on the cases listed. These orders would have included details on bail conditions, trial dates, and other procedural matters necessary for the progression or resolution of the cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.