Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 11 August 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 11 AUGUST 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Petan Pty Ltd
v
Martin Bruce Schult

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link
CLC
Dallas John Eaves
Darren Michael Dobson
Jason Ralph Jay

For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
BLH
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Russell Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Joshua-Ty Laredo

(Part-Heard)

In Court as in Chambers

4:15 p.m.

For Bail Application

Catherine Grace Brown

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Russell Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

4:00pm In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Tiffany Louise Shaw

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.30 am for Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Raymond Roland

4.15pm for Mention
Michael Robert Keeling

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a matter concerning Petan Pty Ltd versus Martin Bruce Schult. The nature of the dispute is not detailed in the extract but pertains to civil jurisdiction. The case was presided over by Chief Justice Blow in Hobart. The legal issues the court was required to decide were not specified in the provided text, as the case summary did not include details on the specific matters argued or adjudicated.

The reasoning and outcome of the court were not detailed in the text, leaving the specifics of the judgment undisclosed. It is noted that the case was listed for judgment, suggesting that the court had deliberated and was ready to deliver its decision. The final orders of the court, if any, are not mentioned in the extract provided.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania was set to deliver judgment in a civil case involving Petan Pty Ltd and Martin Bruce Schult. The legal issues, court's reasoning, and final orders were not provided in the text, thus leaving the specifics of the case resolution unclear.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established