Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 September 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Robert Raymond Kaye
For Legal Argument
Darrel George Harington

4.00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Brendon James Gielen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Daniel Luke Bennett

For Legal Argument

Brodie Leigh Price

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial

Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial

Louise Jane Williams

In Chambers
Before Justice PEARCE

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing by Telephone
Gregory Charles Williams v Sergeant Gary Lusted
Shane Murray Brown v Senior Sergeant John Parker and Anor

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Russell David Potter and Mures Fishing Pty Ltd was scheduled for trial before Chief Justice Blow. The nature of the dispute pertains to criminal charges against the defendants, requiring the court to address allegations that may have significant legal and financial ramifications. The case underscores the court's role in adjudicating serious criminal matters, which often involve complex legal and factual determinations.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide encompassed the interpretation and application of criminal statutes to the facts of the case. The court had to evaluate the evidence presented, consider the defence arguments, and apply relevant legal principles to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants. The outcome of the case would depend on whether the prosecution successfully established the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and whether the defence could effectively counter the allegations.

The court's reasoning and outcome were detailed in the judgment. The court meticulously examined the evidence, assessed the credibility of witnesses, and applied legal standards to reach its decision. The final orders included the determination of guilt or acquittal for the defendants, and potentially, the imposition of penalties or other legal consequences. The detailed judgment provided clarity on the court's approach and the rationale behind its decision, ensuring that the legal process was transparent and justifiable.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established