SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 JULY 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Marcus John Hindrum
v
Sergeant Richard Adam Lane
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nathan Grant Chatters
Beau Vaughan Plowman
For Trial
JLF
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jason Edward Tiedemann
Jacob Roger Dorloff
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Clay Xavier Savage
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
3.00pm
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Christopher Taber
Julius Nkundabanyanka
Conference Room 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
4:15 p.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
Brady Allan Pyke
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellanous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adrian John Pryer
4:00pm For Sentence
Stanley Martin Cash
Troy Mathew Furley
To Follow For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Conference Room 3, Supreme Court, Hobart
Brady Allan Pyke
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 July 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 125
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 125
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning and outcome will depend on the specific legal arguments presented in each case. For instance, in the case of Marcus John Hindrum versus Sergeant Richard Adam Lane, the court will examine the evidence and legal principles to determine the liability and damages, if any, owed by Sergeant Lane to Mr. Hindrum. Similarly, in the criminal cases, the court will assess the evidence presented to decide the guilt or innocence of the defendants and to determine appropriate sentences. In the civil case involving Brady Allan Pyke, the court will evaluate the arguments and facts to decide the dispute between the parties.
The final orders of the court will be communicated after the proceedings. For instance, in the case of Marcus John Hindrum versus Sergeant Richard Adam Lane, the court may award damages to Mr. Hindrum if it is found that Sergeant Lane is liable. In the criminal cases, the court may acquit or convict the defendants and impose sentences accordingly. The outcome of the bail application for Christopher Taber Julius Nkundabanyanka will also be communicated, determining whether the applicant is granted bail or remains in custody. The specific orders will be detailed in the court's written judgments or orders following the hearings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.