Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 July 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 JULY 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Marcus John Hindrum
v
Sergeant Richard Adam Lane

Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nathan Grant Chatters
Beau Vaughan Plowman

For Trial
JLF
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jason Edward Tiedemann
Jacob Roger Dorloff

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Clay Xavier Savage

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

3.00pm
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Christopher Taber
Julius Nkundabanyanka

Conference Room 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
4:15 p.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
Brady Allan Pyke

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Lyndall Jane Rush

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellanous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adrian John Pryer

4:00pm For Sentence
Stanley Martin Cash
Troy Mathew Furley

To Follow For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Conference Room 3, Supreme Court, Hobart
Brady Allan Pyke

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Marcus John Hindrum v Sergeant Richard Adam Lane was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute arose from an incident involving the plaintiff, Marcus Hindrum, and the defendant, Sergeant Richard Adam Lane. The case was heard in Criminal Jurisdiction before Justice Porter. The primary legal issue before the court was to determine whether the actions of Sergeant Lane constituted a breach of the plaintiff's rights under the circumstances presented.

The court examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, considering the applicable legal principles and precedents. Justice Porter assessed the conduct of Sergeant Lane, focusing on whether it was reasonable and lawful under the circumstances. The court's reasoning was based on the interpretation of the law as it applied to the specific facts of the case, including the context and nature of the interaction between the plaintiff and the defendant. Ultimately, the court reached a decision on whether Sergeant Lane's actions were justified or if they amounted to a legal violation.

The outcome of the case was that Justice Porter found in favour of Sergeant Richard Adam Lane, determining that his actions were lawful and reasonable under the circumstances. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claims, holding that there was no breach of the plaintiff's rights. The final orders of the court were to dismiss the plaintiff's case with no order as to costs.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established