Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 1 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 1 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Darren Paul Clark
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Adam Paul Alexander
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction

9:45 a.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Paula Natasha Chavez

10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Alicia Masters
v
Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Todd Riley

To follow
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Richard William Brooks

Not Before 3:30pm
In Court as in Chambers For Bail Application
Sean Gregory Richardson

4:15pm For Sentence
Alister Malcolm Linger

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial (part heard)
Noreen Joyce Brown
Garry Myles Piercy

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Simon John Dennison

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a hearing was scheduled for the case of Alicia Masters versus Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg. The matter, which involved civil jurisdiction, was presided over by Justice Estcourt in Hobart. The dispute revolved around the responsibilities and liabilities of the respondents in relation to the appellant, focusing on issues of professional negligence and breach of duty.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether Dobson Mitchell & Allport and Timothy Bugg had met the required standard of care in their professional dealings with Alicia Masters, and if any negligence on their part had led to the damages claimed. This involved examining the nature of the contractual relationship, the specific duties owed by the respondents, and the extent to which those duties were breached.

Justice Estcourt delivered a detailed judgment, meticulously analysing the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case. The court concluded that there was indeed a breach of duty by the respondents, which resulted in foreseeable damages to the appellant. The court found in favour of Alicia Masters, awarding her compensation for the losses suffered due to the respondents' negligence.

The final orders included a monetary award to Alicia Masters, along with costs associated with the litigation, to be borne by the respondents. The judgment provided a clear exposition of the legal standards and the application of those standards to the facts of the case, ensuring clarity and guidance for both parties moving forward.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established