Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 9 May 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 77


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 9 MAY 2013
HOBART
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
Strike out Statement of Claim/Enter Judgment
Liang
v
Welcom Pty Ltd & Ors

For Hearing
LV Property Investments Pty Ltd
v
Liang & Anor
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 9 May 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 77
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 77
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Liang and Welcom Pty Ltd & Ors was scheduled for hearing on 9 May 2013. The case, identified as Liang v Welcom Pty Ltd & Ors, was set to be heard via video link from Launceston. The dispute appears to concern some form of civil litigation, potentially involving claims related to property or contractual obligations. The court was also set to consider a matter concerning LV Property Investments Pty Ltd versus Liang & Anor, which had been partially heard previously.

The legal issues before the court included determining the merits of the claims presented in the Statement of Claim and deciding whether to strike out certain parts of the claim or enter a judgment in favour of one of the parties. The court had to consider the validity of the claims, the admissibility of evidence, and the legal principles applicable to the specific circumstances of the case. The hearing aimed to resolve the disputes between the parties and provide a definitive outcome based on the evidence and arguments presented.

The court, led by Associate Justice Holt, carefully examined the submissions and evidence provided by both parties. The reasoning and outcome of the court's decision were based on a thorough analysis of the legal principles, the facts of the case, and the relevant authorities. The final orders made by the court reflected the resolution of the legal issues, providing a clear direction for the parties involved in the dispute. The orders were designed to address the specific claims and provide a resolution that was legally sound and fair to both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.