Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 9 August 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 9 AUGUST 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Application

Jackie Maree Fraser

For Plea
Alicia Simone Arnol
Anne Patricia Hoggett
Leigh Alexander Graham
Sandra Leigh Johnson

For Trial
IPP

(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Sulaiman Bin Marhaban
Henki Bire
Safrudin Wotu

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Samantha Barrie Wordsworth
Rhys Louis Gardner
Aaron James Grant
Garry James Brodie
Phillip Colin Noel Bell

For Trial
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers

For Pre-Trial Orders
Garth Leslie Parker as Executor of the Ira Leslie Parker Estate

Tony Edward Parker

Tony Edward Parker
V
Garth Leslie Parker

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4.00 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference
Bradford
V
Connor & Anor

Best
V
Connor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent

Civil Jurisdiction

10.00am For Sentence By Video-Link
Melissa Jayne Gibbons
Annette Maree Spence

For Sentence
Justin Donald Brazendale

For Sentence By Video-Link
Bevan John Gleeson

For Sentence
Bradley Thomas Barrett

For Further Directions Hearing
David John Batge
Darren John Batge
Robert Karl Yohan Stonjek

For Mention
TJB
Shane Allen Wheldon
Corey Joseph Ford

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Scott Cameron Parker
David John Kelly
Clinton Michael Maher
BJM

For Plea
Jason Robert Burns

2.15pm For Sentence
Allison May Howe

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 am

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

Luke Anthony Abraham (AKA: Shane Mark Ivey)

Andrew Phillip Turner

For Mention

Mark Aulich

Paul Kevin Bartlett

Trevor Leo Davern

Adrian Lloyd Reardon

For Sentence

Darryl John Heard

For Plea

Adrian Wayne Smillie

Elijah Joshua Bos

Benjamin James Wright

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard on 9 August 2012. Justice Blow presided over criminal proceedings in Court 7, where applications, pleas, and trials were scheduled. The court heard an application from Jackie Maree Fraser and considered pleas from several defendants, including Alicia Simone Arnol, Anne Patricia Hoggett, and others. Additionally, a part-heard trial involving IPP was scheduled. Justice Porter managed criminal cases in Court 8, including mentions, pleas, and a trial for Manjing Moses Mading and others. Civil matters were handled in Court 1 by Chief Justice Crawford and in Court 3 by Associate Justice Holt, where pre-trial orders and miscellaneous civil business were addressed.

The legal issues that came before the court encompassed a range of criminal and civil matters. In criminal cases, the court needed to decide on bail applications, pleas, and sentences. For instance, the court had to determine whether bail should be granted to Sulaiman Bin Marhaban and Henki Bire, and consider the pleas of defendants like Samantha Barrie Wordsworth and Rhys Louis Gardner. In civil cases, the court dealt with pre-trial orders and other miscellaneous matters. For example, in the case of Garth Leslie Parker as Executor of the Ira Leslie Parker Estate v Tony Edward Parker, the court had to address disputes related to estate matters.

Justice Blow and Justice Porter addressed the criminal cases with a focus on the admissibility of evidence, the legal validity of pleas, and the appropriate sentences for convicted individuals. The reasoning involved careful consideration of the legal frameworks governing criminal law, including the principles of natural justice and the rights of the accused. The outcome of these cases would hinge on the specific facts presented and the legal arguments made by the parties involved. In civil matters, Associate Justice Holt managed pre-trial orders and other civil disputes, ensuring that procedural fairness was upheld and that the rights of the parties were protected.

The final orders of the court would be communicated in due course, following the conclusion of the hearings and any necessary deliberations. These orders would detail the outcomes of the cases heard, including any sentences imposed, the granting or denial of bail, and the resolution of civil disputes. The court's decisions would be based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal standards.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established