SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 7 AUGUST 2014
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Nicholas Mark Stebbins
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Aaron James Crosswell
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Arvind Ravinesh Prasad
Andrew John Wakefield
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Rodney Charles Cuthbert
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11:30 a.m.
For Costs
Gardner and Anor
v
Gardner and Anor
2:15 p.m.
Amend Application
In the matter of an Application by Tasmanian Perpetual Trustee Limited and the Trustee Companies Act 1953 S.27
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Christopher James Barron
4:15pm For Sentence by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Benjamin John Bradshaw
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 am
For Mention
Tara Jayne Stokes
For Application
Zannon Tony Howard
For Plea
Gregory Brian O’Rourke
4.15pm for Sentence
Scott Thomas Clarke
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 7 August 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 155
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 155
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases ranged from bail applications to sentencing and trials. For the bail applications, the court had to consider the merits of releasing the applicants pending their trials. In the sentencing hearings, the court needed to determine the appropriate penalties for the convicted individuals. The trials required the court to assess the evidence and determine the guilt or innocence of the accused.
The court's reasoning and outcomes would depend on the specific facts and evidence presented in each case. For bail applications, the court would consider factors such as the strength of the prosecution's case, the likelihood of the accused attending court, and any risk of flight or interference with witnesses. In sentencing, the court would weigh aggravating and mitigating factors to determine an appropriate penalty. For trials, the court would assess the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency of the evidence to reach a verdict.
No final orders were provided in the document, but the outcomes would be communicated separately.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.