Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 6 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Brett Corey Pickett
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Mark Leonard Thomas

For Application for Witness Expenses
Anthony Colin Finnegan

For Sentence
Paul Fraser Catto
Jacob Anthony Burdon

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter by video-link from Court 8, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.00pm For Mention
Mark Leonard Thomas

BURNIE

No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several matters on Thursday, 6 March 2014. A notable case was Brett Corey Pickett v State of Tasmania, heard in Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice Porter. This case involved a dispute concerning criminal jurisdiction. The court was tasked with deciding on various legal issues, including the interpretation of criminal law provisions and the appropriate jurisdiction for the case.

The court considered the arguments presented by both parties, focusing on the jurisdictional aspects of the case. Justice Porter delivered a detailed judgment, outlining the reasoning behind the decision. The court concluded that the matter should be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, affirming the jurisdiction of the court in this instance. The decision provided clarity on the jurisdictional boundaries between different courts in Tasmania, which could have implications for future cases.

The final orders of the court were communicated in the judgment, which also included the court's reasoning and the legal principles applied. This case highlights the importance of jurisdictional issues in criminal proceedings and the role of the Supreme Court in resolving such matters. The outcome provides guidance for similar cases in the future, ensuring consistency in the application of criminal law.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established