Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 June 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 6 JUNE 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Shelley Anne Percy

For Mention
Randall Anthony House
Melissa Jane Woolley
Leesa Nicole Tovey
Melissa Mollross
Rajdeep Singh

For Bail Variation
Angela Dolly Crozier

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Luke Anthony Shaw

For Plea
Michael Edward Deering
Nicholas Mark Bull

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Jared Joseph Broadby
JMM
Bradley John Kremmer

For Bail Consent
Christopher Harold Denny

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Tristian Haugland

For Application to Review
DKDM

For Plea
Brett Stewart Bonnitcha

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Melissa Rose Connors
John Anthony George

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
4:15 p.m.

For Sentence
Via video link to Burnie

JHW

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
For Mention
Meaganne Glover

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.30 a.m.
For Hearing
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
S.J. Hooper Pty Ltd

12.30 p.m.
Prepare for Trial
Qasair Investments Pty Ltd
v
Quarmby

Qasair Investments
v
Quarmby & Anor

2.15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Roberts Limited
v
Frifth-Brown & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00am For Mention
Christopher Ernest Denman
Asador Hinsta
Nathan John Jones

For Further Directions Hearing
Brett Christopher Hayes

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Kurt Douglas Brimfield
Zach Rodney Ruffels
BLJ
Samuel Clinton Wilmot

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart
JHW

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania's Hobart court handled various criminal and civil matters on Thursday, June 6, 2013. Among the cases was the Commonwealth Bank of Australia versus S.J. Hooper Pty Ltd, which was listed for hearing at 11.30 a.m. This case involved a dispute related to financial transactions or contractual obligations between the two parties. Another notable case was Qasair Investments Pty Ltd versus Quarmby, scheduled for a hearing at 12.30 p.m. This case likely pertained to disputes arising from commercial dealings or property issues. Additionally, Roberts Limited versus Frifth-Brown & Anor was set for a prepare for trial hearing at 2.15 p.m., indicating that the case was in the process of preparation for a full trial, likely involving issues such as contract law or property rights.

The legal issues in these cases would have involved interpreting the relevant laws governing the specific disputes, such as contract law, commercial law, or financial regulations. The court's task was to examine the evidence, apply the law, and make decisions based on the merits of each case. For the Commonwealth Bank of Australia versus S.J. Hooper Pty Ltd, the court needed to determine whether the bank had valid claims against the defendant for financial transactions or breaches of contract. In the case of Qasair Investments Pty Ltd versus Quarmby, the court had to assess whether the plaintiff's claims for damages or other relief were substantiated by the evidence and the applicable law.

The reasoning and outcome of the hearings would depend on the specifics of each case, including the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by the parties. For the Commonwealth Bank of Australia versus S.J. Hooper Pty Ltd, the court might have ruled on whether the bank's claims were valid, the extent of any liability, and the remedies available. Similarly, for Qasair Investments Pty Ltd versus Quarmby, the court would have evaluated the merits of the plaintiff's claims and the defendant's defences. The decisions made in these cases would set the stage for any further proceedings, such as trials or appeals, depending on the outcomes.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established