Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 February 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 18


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 6 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Anthony Vivian Saunders
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Sally Anne McGuire
Paul Fraser Catto

For Plea
Sonny Day

Not Before 12:00 p.m.
For Legal Argument
Joseph Andrew Edwards

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Allanby
v
Rowlands & KDM Investments Pty Ltd

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial

Troy Richard Vernon Lovell
Derrick Michael Crosswell
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Michael Robert Bennett

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Adrian Howard James Hall
v
Jayne Louise Hall

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel Johnston Russell
v
Hongfei Chu
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Summary Judgment
Seddon
v
Parsons Bay Lodge Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Clifford
v
Dahl

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Golz & Anor
v
Bury

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Roger Edwin Fidler

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Scott Wayne Evenett
Clint Graeme Stanisz

4.00pm For Sentence
BMM

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
In Court
For Trial (Part-heard)
Justin James Lange

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 6 February 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 18
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 18
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a series of hearings on 6 February 2014. One notable case involved Allanby versus Rowlands and KDM Investments Pty Ltd, presided over by Justice Porter. The nature of the dispute centred around a commercial transaction, with the plaintiff seeking relief against the defendants for breaches of contract or possibly tortious actions. The case was heard in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of contractual terms and the applicability of certain common law principles to the facts of the case. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the defendants had breached the terms of the contract and, if so, the appropriate remedy. Additionally, the court considered whether any equitable doctrines or statutory provisions should be applied to mitigate or amplify the damages sought by the plaintiff.

Justice Porter, in delivering the judgment, meticulously analysed the contractual documents and the relevant case law. The court concluded that the defendants had indeed breached the contract and that the breach had caused significant loss to the plaintiff. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff, providing a detailed calculation of the loss and the basis for the quantum of damages. The judgment also included directions for the enforcement of the judgment and the procedures for any potential appeals.

The final orders of the court mandated that the defendants pay the plaintiff the sum of damages determined, along with interest accruing from the date of the judgment. The court also ordered that the defendants bear the costs of the proceedings, subject to any successful application for costs by the plaintiff.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.