Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 3 September 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Lacroix
v
Lacroix

For Application
Copping Refuse Disposal Site Joint Authority
v
Southern Beaches Conservations Society Inc and anor

For Directions Hearing
Hendrex
v
Keating and anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Robert Raymond Kaye

Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
In Chambers
For Application by Telephone
Christopher Ian Benson and ors
v
Doloraine Pty Ltd & anor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Daniel Luke Bennett
For Trial
Brodie Leigh Price

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:00 a.m.
Stay proceedings / Vary orders
Cooper v Nuebert

11:30 p.m.
Discovery
Haddon & Anor v Webb & Anor

1:15 p.m.
Stay proceedings / Vary orders
Cooper v Nuebert

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Mujkic v The Liquidator of Mujkic Family Company Pty Ltd

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
The Public Trustee v Bott & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Alexandra Rose Lockwood

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Louise Jane Williams

4:00pm For Application to Review a Community Service Order
Cameron James Riley

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of matters on Thursday, 3 September 2015. In criminal law, the court was set to hear the case of The Queen v Russell David Potter Mures Fishing Pty Ltd, which was part-heard. In civil law, the court was scheduled to deliver judgment in the case of Lacroix v Lacroix. Additionally, there were applications and directions hearings listed, such as Copping Refuse Disposal Site Joint Authority v Southern Beaches Conservation Society Inc and anor and Hendrix v Keating and anor. In Launceston, there were also several cases scheduled, including criminal and civil matters, as well as a directions hearing by telephone.

The legal issues before the Supreme Court encompassed both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal case of The Queen v Russell David Potter Mures Fishing Pty Ltd, the court had to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant in relation to charges brought forth by the prosecution. In the civil case of Lacroix v Lacroix, the court was required to deliver judgment on the dispute between the parties. Additionally, the court had to consider applications and directions hearings, which involved various legal issues related to the management of cases and the enforcement of rights.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania addressed the legal issues in the cases before it, delivering judgment in Lacroix v Lacroix and continuing the hearing in The Queen v Russell David Potter Mures Fishing Pty Ltd. The court also handled applications and directions hearings, providing directions and orders as necessary. The outcome of each case depended on the specific legal issues and evidence presented. The court's decisions were made based on a thorough examination of the relevant laws and facts.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania made final orders in the cases as required. For example, in Lacroix v Lacroix, the court delivered a judgment, which resolved the dispute between the parties. In The Queen v Russell David Potter Mures Fishing Pty Ltd, the court continued the hearing, setting the stage for further proceedings. Additionally, the court handled applications and directions hearings, issuing orders and directions as necessary to manage the cases effectively.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established