Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 3 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Nathan John Cosgrove

For Mention
Glenn William Strong

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing

Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
v
Ivan Mercer

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Application
In the matter of the Legal Profession Act 2007
and in the matter of Joanne Frances Matthews

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Taxation
v
French

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued its law lists for Thursday, 3 October 2013, detailing the scheduled cases and hearings. Among the listed matters was a bail application by Nathan John Cosgrove, indicating that the applicant was seeking to be released on bail pending further legal proceedings. Another case involved Glenn William Strong for a mention, where the court would likely address procedural or administrative matters. A directions hearing was scheduled for Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Ivan Mercer, where the court would provide guidance on the progression of the case.

The legal issues in these cases included the criteria for granting bail in criminal cases, procedural matters in ongoing litigation, and the appropriate directions for the case's advancement. The court would have to consider the merits of Cosgrove's bail application, assess any procedural issues raised by Strong's mention, and provide strategic guidance for Allianz's case against Mercer. The reasoning and outcome for each case would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented.

The court's reasoning and outcomes would be documented in the respective case files, detailing how the legal issues were addressed and resolved. The final orders, if any, would reflect the court's decisions on bail, procedural matters, and case directions. These outcomes would form part of the legal record and influence the subsequent steps in the respective cases.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established