SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 28 JUNE 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Kurt Stanley James
Aaron James Crosswell
(Part heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
IPP
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
RST
V
Sergeant Richard lane
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Mystate Financial Limited
v
Van Der Kooij & anor
(part heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Corey Joseph Ford
MAJ
Barry William James Gleeson
10.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Anthony Carr
4.15pm For Sentence
Tegan Lee Odgers
Peter Anthony Beattie
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 am
For Sentence
Jason Keith Harrison
For Mention
Andrew Phillip Turner
Adrian Lloyd Reardon
Mark Aulich
Darryl John Heard
Paul Kevin Bartlett
JMWM
For Bail Consent
Brad Geoffrey Arnold
Kyle Lockett
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 28 June 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 116
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 116
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied, spanning both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal cases, the defendants faced charges ranging from bail applications to trial mentions and sentencing. The civil case involved a dispute between Mystate Financial Limited and Van Der Kooij & anor, with the nature of the dispute not detailed in the court lists. Additionally, the judgment concerning Sergeant Richard Lane would address specific legal matters pertinent to his case.
Justice Tennant, Justice Wood, and Justice Evans presided over the criminal cases in Hobart, while Justice Porter and Justice Blow handled cases in Launceston and Burnie, respectively. Associate Justice Holt was responsible for the civil case in Hobart. The reasoning and outcome of these cases were not detailed in the court lists provided. However, it can be inferred that each case would be addressed according to the respective jurisdiction and the legal principles applicable to each matter.
No final orders were mentioned in the court lists, indicating that the cases were either in progress or awaiting further court action. The outcomes of these cases would depend on the evidence presented, legal arguments made, and the decisions rendered by the respective justices.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.