SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit
10:00 a.m.
For Application for Preliminary Proceedings via Video-Link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Ellen Irene Amy Tiller
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison
Jamie Gregory McCrossen
For Sentence
Brendan Lee Woods
Gavin Daniel Hornberg
Aaron James Irwin
Luke Andrew Irwin
For Facts and Sentence
Jason Charles Dare
For Application to Review a Community Service Order
Brett David Allen
2:15 p.m.
For Application to Review a Suspended Sentence
Shayden James Cowen
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Application to Revoke Bail
KA
For Mention
Mark Anthony Watkins
For Plea
Scott Clifford Mitchell
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Glenn Thomas Cleaver
Simon Jonathan Taylor
Aaron Castle Craig
Mickeal Bechara
Shadi Farhat
Stephen Sebit Enadio
Michael Anglin
Jassy Anglin
Michael James Harris
Hayden Charles Bannister
Robert John Christiaan Nieuwhof
Dawn Ruth Flower
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
For Plea
Robert Raymond Kaye
Antonio Gomes Guerra
Benjamin Michael Fama
Bail Consent
Rodney Matthew Klye
Shaun Mathew Dimech
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Thomas Rundle Mead
v
Magistrate M Brett
Sergeant Richard Lane
v
Bradley Chaplin
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Damien Wesley Marshall
MNH
Sean Gregory Richardson
Melissa Sue Dingjan
For Bail Application
JSCRM
For Plea
DPG
PLT
Danielle Lee Parker-Daniel
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30am For Directions Hearing
Robin Wayne Gibson v Tasmania Police
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Sentence
CGH
BMC
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 25 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 198
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 198
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompass a range of criminal proceedings, including directions hearings, bail applications, pleas, and sentencing. The court will also consider applications to review community service orders and suspended sentences. The civil case involves a mention regarding a dispute between Thomas Rundle Mead and the Magistrate M Brett, as well as a case between Sergeant Richard Lane and Bradley Chaplin.
The court's reasoning and outcome will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. The directions hearing for Tony John Pettit will likely determine the next steps in the proceedings, while the application for preliminary proceedings by Ellen Irene Amy Tiller will focus on whether the case can proceed via video-link. Bail applications and pleas will hinge on the individual circumstances of the defendants and the evidence presented. Sentencing hearings will consider the nature of the offence and the appropriate punishment, while applications to review community service orders and suspended sentences will require an examination of the defendant's compliance and the reasons for the review. The civil case will involve the court's interpretation of the legal dispute between the parties.
The final orders of the court will be determined based on the specific outcomes of each case. The directions hearing for Tony John Pettit will set the procedural path forward, while the application for preliminary proceedings by Ellen Irene Amy Tiller will either be approved or denied. Bail applications and pleas will result in either the release or continued detention of the defendants, while sentencing hearings will establish the punishment for those found guilty. Applications to review community service orders and suspended sentences will either affirm the original decision or impose new conditions. The civil case will result in a judgment on the dispute between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.