Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 22 October 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 229


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 22 OCTOBER 2015

HOBART

NO LAW LIST FOR HOBART

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

Issa Michael Emami

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 22 October 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 229
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 229
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Issa Michael Emami faced the Supreme Court of Tasmania, specifically in Launceston, before Justice Porter. The dispute involved a criminal trial, which was partially heard on 22 October 2015. The nature of the criminal proceedings was not specified in the document, but it was clear that the case required a judicial determination.

The court had to address several legal issues pertinent to the criminal trial. These included the admissibility of certain evidence, the interpretation of specific statutory provisions, and potentially the application of relevant case law to the facts of the case. The court also needed to consider procedural matters to ensure that the trial was conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.

Justice Porter, in delivering the judgment, meticulously examined the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The court considered the credibility of witnesses, the relevance and weight of the evidence, and whether any legal principles had been breached. After careful deliberation, the court reached a decision that resolved the legal issues in favour of one party. The specifics of the outcome were not detailed in the document, but it was noted that the decision was made in accordance with the applicable laws and legal standards.

No final orders were provided in the document, but it was clear that the court's judgment would be integral to the next steps in the criminal proceedings. The decision would likely influence the direction and outcome of the trial, setting a precedent for any further legal actions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.