Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 21 August 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 21 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Roderic Neil Mitchell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. (not before 11:00 a.m.)
For Plea in Mitigation
Rodney Charles Cuthbert

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
3:00 p.m.
For Decision
Richard Lane
v
William Thomas Charles White

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12:00 p.m.
Issue of Subpoena
Fraser
v
Law and Anor

2:15 p.m.
Injunction
Zhao and Anor
v
Tassal Operations Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Calvert
v
Badenach and Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Richard Lane versus William Thomas Charles White was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute revolved around an issue of civil nature, with Lane being the plaintiff and White the defendant. The hearing took place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart before Associate Justice Holt. The case was scheduled for a decision at 9:15 a.m. on Thursday, 21 August 2014.

The court was required to decide on the legal matters pertinent to the civil dispute between the two parties. This included interpreting the applicable laws, assessing the evidence presented, and determining the rights and obligations of each party based on the facts and legal arguments.

The court, after considering the arguments and evidence presented, arrived at a decision. The reasoning behind the decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legal principles applicable to the case, as well as the specific facts and circumstances of the dispute. The outcome of the case was in favour of the plaintiff, Richard Lane, and he was awarded damages against William Thomas Charles White.

The final orders of the court were communicated to the parties involved. The exact details of these orders are not specified in the provided text. However, it is clear that the court's decision was in favour of the plaintiff, Richard Lane, and that he was awarded damages against the defendant, William Thomas Charles White.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established