Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 20 November 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 20 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leah Lesley Cannon
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jodie Essie Latham
Yared Ayana Gebreselassie

For Application to Review
Nicole Maree McGowan

For Trial
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Victor Marshall

For Trial
Julie Louise Rowbottom

2:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Scott Clifford Mitchell

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Shannon James Duffy
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business via video link to Launceston

4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
v
Darby

4.15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Crack
v
Schofield & Anor

4.30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Fea Plantations Ltd & Anor
v
Couttie

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
MCW

To Follow For Trial (Part Heard)
Alissa Margaret Moore
Mark Andrew Jenkins

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Adrian John Hall

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Brett Richard Jackson

Tara Jayne Stokes

For Trial

Jason Noel Rowe

(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a hearing on 20 November 2014. One case of interest was Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Darby, a civil matter heard by Associate Justice Holt. The dispute involved tax obligations, with the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation suing Darby for outstanding taxes. The court was tasked with determining whether Darby was liable for the taxes claimed and, if so, the amount owed.

The primary legal issue the court had to address was the validity and calculation of the tax liability asserted by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation. The court needed to assess the evidence presented regarding Darby's income and tax filings to decide if the tax owed was correctly calculated and whether Darby had fulfilled his tax obligations. This involved examining the tax laws applicable to Darby’s situation and reviewing the accuracy of the tax assessments issued.

In delivering its reasoning, the court examined the documentation and testimonies provided by both parties. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation had correctly calculated the tax liability based on the evidence presented, and Darby had not discharged his tax obligations as required by law. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the Deputy Commissioner, confirming Darby's liability for the taxes owed.

The final orders mandated that Darby pay the outstanding taxes to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation within a specified period. This decision highlighted the importance of accurate tax filings and compliance with tax laws.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established