Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 20 December 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 20 DECEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Mention

Christopher David Benjamine Wilton

In Court as in Chambers

Bail Application

Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 pm
For Sentence
Emily Michelle Afa

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
11.30 a.m.

For Sentence by video link to Burnie

Cyrus Francis Halfacre

Civil Jurisdiction

11.30 a.m.

For Judgment

Andrea Martine Haley and Davies Brothers Pty Ltd

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.30 a.m.
For Judgment
Narelle Willcocks
v
Djaan Heathcote

LAUNCESTON
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers

3.00pm For Bail Variation
Gary James Harper
Luke Anthony Shaw

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

11.30 a.m. For Sentence (by Video Link from Hobart)
Cyrus Francis Halfacre

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear several cases on Thursday, 20 December 2012. One of the cases involved a bail application by Christopher David Benjamine Wilton, which was to be heard in Court 8 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Justice Evans. Another case involved sentencing for Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey, also to be heard in Court 8, before Justice Porter. Additionally, Emily Michelle Afa was scheduled for sentencing before Justice Wood in the same court, with the proceedings to be conducted via video link to Burnie.

The court was required to determine the bail application for Wilton, considering the circumstances of the case and the potential risks associated with granting or denying bail. For Robinson-Stacey, the court needed to decide an appropriate sentence, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors. The court also needed to determine an appropriate sentence for Afa, with considerations given to the principles of sentencing and any relevant mitigating or aggravating factors.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were not provided in the document. However, it is expected that the court would have considered the relevant legal principles, evidence, and arguments presented by the parties involved in each case when making its decisions. The final orders for each case, including any bail decisions, sentences, or judgments, would have been communicated to the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established