Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 2 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 2 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Decision
Jamie Peter Smart

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Madison Stuart Ansell

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Adrian John Hall

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Dismiss Action
Quarmby
v
Oakley and Anor

LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Supreme Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Madison Stuart Ansell
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Jamie Peter Smart, presided over by Justice Tennent. The nature of the dispute was criminal in nature, and the hearing was scheduled for 2:15 p.m. The court was required to make a decision regarding the matter.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of specific criminal statutes and the application of relevant case law to the facts of the case. The court had to determine whether the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to establish the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as well as any mitigating or aggravating factors that might influence the sentence.

Justice Tennent considered the evidence presented and the applicable legal principles. The court found the defendant guilty and delivered a verdict accordingly. The sentencing phase was also addressed, taking into account the nature of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, and any other relevant factors. The final orders included a specific sentence for the defendant, which was to be served in accordance with the court's decision.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established