SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley
For Bail Consent
Jack Owen Read
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Queen
v
Tasmanian Industrial Commission;
ex parte the Minister Administering the State Service Act 2000
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. by video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
2:15 p.m.
Assessment of Damages
Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd
v
Michael Stanojevic
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Dallas Marsahall
v
Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Jacqueline Katona
v
Public Trustee as the Personal Representative of the late Rebecca Helen Weily
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30am For Mention via Video Link
Ziggy Robert James Brunskill
To Follow
For Plea
Samuel Troy Leslie
Anthony Charles Mare
2:00pm For Legal Argument
David Ronald Morgan
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Richard William Johnston
To Follow
For Bail Consent
Christina Vernessa Watson
Katarzyna Wanda Stadnicka
Shannon Lee Ruffels
Ethen Wayne Nicholls (aka Ethen Wayne Prem)
To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Facts and Plea in Mitigation
Noel Marcus Smith
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 252
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 252
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to consider the nature and extent of the damages claimed, the evidence presented by both parties, and any applicable legal principles or precedents. The reasoning of the court would have involved a detailed analysis of the facts of the case, the contractual obligations between the parties, and the principles of damages in tort and contract law. The outcome of the assessment would have been based on a thorough evaluation of the merits of the claim and the evidence provided.
The final orders of the court would have specified the amount of damages to be awarded to Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd, along with any other relevant directions or costs. The decision would have provided clarity and resolution to the dispute between the parties, ensuring that the injured party received appropriate compensation for the losses suffered.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.