Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 November 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 252


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Rodney Matthew Klye
Jodie Diane Earley

For Bail Consent
Jack Owen Read

For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Queen
v
Tasmanian Industrial Commission;
ex parte the Minister Administering the State Service Act 2000

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. by video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Assessment of Damages
Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd
v
Michael Stanojevic

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Dallas Marsahall
v
Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Jacqueline Katona
v
Public Trustee as the Personal Representative of the late Rebecca Helen Weily

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:30am For Mention via Video Link
Ziggy Robert James Brunskill

To Follow
For Plea
Samuel Troy Leslie
Anthony Charles Mare

2:00pm For Legal Argument
David Ronald Morgan

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Richard William Johnston

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Christina Vernessa Watson
Katarzyna Wanda Stadnicka
Shannon Lee Ruffels
Ethen Wayne Nicholls (aka Ethen Wayne Prem)

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)

Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Facts and Plea in Mitigation

Noel Marcus Smith

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 252
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 252
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on Thursday, 19 November 2015, in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, where various cases were scheduled for mention, bail, trial, and hearing. Among the cases listed was Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd v Michael Stanojevic, which was set for assessment of damages in Court 3 in Hobart. The legal dispute between Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd and Michael Stanojevic involved claims regarding damages. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate compensation to be awarded to Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd.

The court had to consider the nature and extent of the damages claimed, the evidence presented by both parties, and any applicable legal principles or precedents. The reasoning of the court would have involved a detailed analysis of the facts of the case, the contractual obligations between the parties, and the principles of damages in tort and contract law. The outcome of the assessment would have been based on a thorough evaluation of the merits of the claim and the evidence provided.

The final orders of the court would have specified the amount of damages to be awarded to Pattersons Insurerbuild Pty Ltd, along with any other relevant directions or costs. The decision would have provided clarity and resolution to the dispute between the parties, ensuring that the injured party received appropriate compensation for the losses suffered.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.