Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 March 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 47


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 19 MARCH 2015

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Sergeant Richard Lane
v
Bradley John Chaplin

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m
For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Christopher Paul Minehan
(Part Heard)

In Court as in Chambers
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Aaron Henderson Gray

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Hearing via video link from
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Graham Maitland Marshall
v
Retirement Benefits Fund Board

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Troy Leslie Eirth
v
Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Klug
v
Southern Cross Telco Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:15am For Trial (Part Heard)
Benjamin Thomas Lynch

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Hearing (via video link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart)
Graham Maitland Marshall
v
Retirement Benefits Fund Board

Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (part-heard)
Glenn Paul Watts

11:30am
For Voir Dire (part-heard)
Justin Raynor Bott
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 19 March 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 47
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 47
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of matters on Thursday, 19 March 2015. In Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, the Full Court was scheduled to deliver judgment in the case of Sergeant Richard Lane versus Bradley John Chaplin. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the court lists, but it was likely to involve some form of civil or criminal litigation. The case was presided over by the Full Court, which indicated that it would be a significant matter.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide in this case were not explicitly stated in the court lists. However, given that it was before the Full Court, it was likely to involve complex legal questions or issues of significant public importance. The court's decision in this case would have important implications for the parties involved, as well as for the broader legal community.

The court's reasoning and outcome in this case were not specified in the court lists. However, given that it was before the Full Court, it is likely that the court took a thorough and careful approach to the legal issues involved. The outcome of the case would have been determined based on a detailed analysis of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, as well as relevant legal principles and precedents.

The final orders of the court were not specified in the court lists. However, it is likely that the court's judgment would have provided a detailed explanation of its reasoning and the legal principles applied in reaching its decision. The outcome of the case would have been communicated to the parties involved, and any orders made by the court would have been enforced accordingly.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.