Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 17 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jose Vasquez-Amay

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Glenn William Strong

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Price
v
Southern Cross Television (TNT9) Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.15am For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
Shadi Farhat

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Nathan Henry Riley

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jesse Luke Kent v. Grace Ellen Payne

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Christopher Luke Finn

11:30 a.m.
For Plea
Noela Jean Smith

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of matters over the course of its law lists on Thursday, 17 October 2013. In Court 7, the Chief Justice Blow presided over a part-heard trial of Jose Vasquez-Amay. This case involved criminal charges against the defendant, with the specific nature of the charges not detailed in the summary. Also in Hobart, Justice Tennent heard a part-heard trial of Tu Ai Lin in Court 1, again involving criminal charges against the defendant. Justice Estcourt in Court 8 presided over a bail application from Glenn William Strong.

The legal issues in these cases primarily centred around the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of statutory provisions, and the appropriate application of bail conditions. The court had to ensure that the defendants' rights were protected, while also considering the public interest and the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court. The reasoning of the court would have focused on balancing these considerations in light of the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to each case.

The outcomes of these matters would have depended on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. The court's decisions would have been based on a detailed analysis of the evidence, the application of relevant legal principles, and the discretion afforded to the court in each case. The final orders would have varied depending on the nature of the charges and the specific circumstances of each defendant.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established