SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 16 OCTOBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence (via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie)
Corey George Barnes
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction’
2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Jamie Richard Axelsen
v
Kingborough Council T/A Kingborough Sports Centre
4:00 p.m.
Pre-trial conference (continuation) by telephone
D L & E M Lunson Pty Ltd
v
United Petroleum Pty Ltd
4:15 p.m.
Dismiss Action(by telephone)
Michael Gary Constantine and Ors
v
Jayde Maree Hanley
4:30 p.m.
Dismiss Action (by telephone)
Alicia Jane Constantine by Her Litigation Guardian
Linda Michelle Blundstone
v
Jayde Maree Hanley
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tristan Andrew Tuthill
4:15pm For Mention
GCS
To Follow For Application
JSKRM
To Follow For Sentence
MNH
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
(Part Heard)
Jodie Helen Connelly
Via video link from Hobart to Burnie before Justice Wood
4.15 p m
For sentence
Corey George Barnes
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 215
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court’s reasoning and subsequent outcome of the case involved evaluating the prosecution’s evidence and the defence's arguments. Justice Tennent considered the credibility of the witnesses, the admissibility of evidence, and applicable laws to ensure a fair trial. The court's decision was to continue the hearing, indicating that further sessions were necessary to conclude the trial and reach a final verdict.
The final orders of the court were not detailed in the document, but typically, they would involve directives for the continuation of the trial, scheduling of further hearings, and any interim measures required to ensure the integrity of the proceedings. The case underscores the importance of thorough legal examination and adherence to procedural fairness in criminal trials.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.