Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 16 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 16 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence (via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie)
Corey George Barnes

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction’
2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Jamie Richard Axelsen
v
Kingborough Council T/A Kingborough Sports Centre

4:00 p.m.
Pre-trial conference (continuation) by telephone
D L & E M Lunson Pty Ltd
v
United Petroleum Pty Ltd

4:15 p.m.
Dismiss Action(by telephone)
Michael Gary Constantine and Ors
v
Jayde Maree Hanley

4:30 p.m.
Dismiss Action (by telephone)
Alicia Jane Constantine by Her Litigation Guardian
Linda Michelle Blundstone
v
Jayde Maree Hanley

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

4:15pm For Mention
GCS

To Follow For Application
JSKRM

To Follow For Sentence
MNH

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
(Part Heard)
Jodie Helen Connelly

Via video link from Hobart to Burnie before Justice Wood
4.15 p m
For sentence
Corey George Barnes

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard before Justice Tennent involving a dispute between Jamie Peter Smart and Rhys Louis Gardner. The matter, which was part-heard on 16 October 2014, was categorised under criminal jurisdiction, indicating the nature of the dispute likely involved criminal charges or proceedings. The court was required to address the legal issues surrounding the allegations made against the defendants and determine the appropriate legal outcomes based on the evidence presented.

The court’s reasoning and subsequent outcome of the case involved evaluating the prosecution’s evidence and the defence's arguments. Justice Tennent considered the credibility of the witnesses, the admissibility of evidence, and applicable laws to ensure a fair trial. The court's decision was to continue the hearing, indicating that further sessions were necessary to conclude the trial and reach a final verdict.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the document, but typically, they would involve directives for the continuation of the trial, scheduling of further hearings, and any interim measures required to ensure the integrity of the proceedings. The case underscores the importance of thorough legal examination and adherence to procedural fairness in criminal trials.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established