Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday 15 March 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY 15 MARCH 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
JJBV
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
TCT
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via Video Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
For Sentence
JWT

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Senior Constable Damian Cooper
V
Michael Anthony Howard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Amend Reply and Defence
Lincolne
v
The Public Trustee

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Brenpine Holdings Pty
v
Grogan and Anor

4:30 p.m.
Pre-Trial Conference by Telephone
Willcocks
v
Heathcote

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Mention
Christopher Charles Johnson

For Trial
MAJ

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 AM
For Voir Dire (part heard)

Anthony Colin Finnegan

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 pm
For Sentence via video link
from Court 7, Supreme Court Hobart

JWT

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard before Associate Justice Holt involving Senior Constable Damian Cooper as the plaintiff and Michael Anthony Howard as the defendant. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the document, but it was a civil matter. The hearing took place in Court 3 at Salamanca Place in Hobart. The legal issues that the court was required to decide were not outlined in the document. However, it is known that the case involved a hearing where an amend reply and defence were presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the document. It is possible that the case was ongoing at the time of publication, and a decision had not yet been made. The final orders of the court were not stated in the document. However, it is possible that the court may have made a ruling or decision after the hearing took place.

Overall, the document provides a brief overview of the court lists for a specific day in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. While the details of the individual cases were not provided, the document gives an indication of the types of cases that were being heard and the courts in which they were being heard. It is important for practising lawyers to stay up-to-date with court lists and case outcomes to provide the best possible legal advice to their clients.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established