Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 14 August 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 14 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Wayne Simpson
Ryan Allan Albert Purdy
Jason Scott Picken
Matthew Maccreesh
Adrian Raymond Nattey
JMM
WRB
Tanya Maree Silva
Frederick Edward Petrasek
Chantelle Louise Fitzpatrick
Barry John King

For Mention by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Nathan Grant Chatters

Plea in Mitigation
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

For Sentence
Andrew Charles Ellerton
Samuel Patrick Burke Drummond
Rebecca Louise Morgan

For Plea
Jason Charles Dare
Vance Roy Lobban

For Facts and Sentence
MJK
Nathan Bush

Bail Consent
Nathan Robert Griffith
Rodney Matthew Klye
JPG

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Brendan Lee Woods

4:00 p.m.
Application to review a Probation Order
TDT

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer
(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Wayne Wakefield

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Mary Nicole Irvine
Deborah Anne Devine

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Erol Cinar
v
The Law Society of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
New Bounty Pty Ltd and Anor
v
Winpar Holdings Ltd and Ors

4:00 p.m.
For mention by telephone
Boat Harbour Beach Blue Waters Pty Ltd
v
Matthews Properties Pty Ltd and Ors

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited
v
Ian Peter Atkins

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Decision by Video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Lauren Cannell v Roseanne Amanda Hughes

Criminal Jurisdiction
For Mention by Video-link
Carl Maxwell Hall
Bevan John Gleeson

For Directions by Video-link
Lokendra Singh

For Mention
Adam Maxwell Cox
Mark Paul Phillips
Cameron James Brasher
Stewart Robert McLean
Brodie Leigh Jones
Michael John Hess

For Discharge
Michael Andrew Chorley
Brian Rex Brown

For Directions
Benjamin Shay Hosking
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

Not Before 11am
For Sentence
Troy Mathew Furley

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 am for Decision via video link from Court 1, Launceston
Lauren Cannell v Roseanne Amanda Hughes

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a number of matters were listed for hearing on August 14, 2014. Notable among these was a criminal case involving multiple defendants scheduled for mention and sentencing. The defendants, including Paul Wayne Simpson, Ryan Allan Albert Purdy, Jason Scott Picken, and others, were facing various charges. The legal issues at hand primarily revolved around the procedural aspects of the criminal cases, including pleas, bail applications, and sentencing. The court was tasked with addressing the appropriate legal frameworks and precedents to determine the outcomes for these defendants.

The court's reasoning, as reflected in the listing, indicated a structured approach to the proceedings. Justice Tennent, presiding over the criminal cases, ensured that each defendant had the opportunity to present their plea and mitigating factors, particularly in cases where sentencing was concerned. The outcomes of these hearings would depend on the specifics of each case, including the nature of the offenses, the defendants' prior records, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances presented. Decisions on bail and other procedural matters would also be made based on the legal criteria relevant to each individual case.

In summary, the court's proceedings were designed to ensure that each defendant received a fair hearing, with the outcomes being determined based on the applicable laws and legal principles. The final orders would be documented in the court's records, reflecting the decisions made on pleas, bail, and sentences for the respective defendants.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established