Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 13 December 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 13 DECEMBER 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Sentence
Steven Kevin Jones

For Further Directions Hearing
Tamara Elizabeth Watts
Brett Anthony Morgan
BJC

For First Directions Hearing
Phillip Ronald Barton
Corey Luke Cordwell
Bradley Andrew Edward Devine
Andrew Richard Denny

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Mark William Eather
AEH
Anna Lisa Bellamy
Christopher Harold Denny
Jose Vasquez-Amay
Peter Edward Kreiner
Kerry Leigh Large

For Bail Consent
Matthew John Davey
Phillip Mark Law
CJC
Adrian David Barwick

For Plea
NPP
Joshua James Bailey
Cameron Scott Clark
Phillip Mark Dare
Natasha Michelle Butler
Roderick Leigh Triffett
Andrew Grant Ringrose
Renee Michelle Barker
Cameron Matthew Roberts
Jared Joseph Broadby
Darrell John Smith

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
TAJC
Michael Jason Hinds
James Peter Sampson
Kyle Leslie Maxwell Lynch
Shayden James Cowen
Darren James Ford

For Plea
Eugene William Smith
Andrew Ian Devine
Lewis Wayne Coles
Peta Louise Feil

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gen 3 Development Pty Ltd & Anor
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal & Anor

Gen 3 Development Pty Ltd & Anor
v
Devonport City Council

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
West Tamar Council
v
Tasmanian Planning Commission

Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation (Northern Region) Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Planning Commission

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
1.45 p.m.

For Judgment by Video-Link from Burnie

Matthew Paul Francis

Richard Lane

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9.15 a.m.

Via video link to Launceston

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am Discharge
Carl Maxwell Hall

For First Appearance
David James Oakley
Shaun Keverall Kaye

For Remand
Michael Vernon Lowe
Darryl Scott Donohue

For Mention
Meshack Hamzie Kamara
Issa Sebleh Dumbuya
Johannes Cornelius Konyn
Darrold Arthur Gleeson
Colin David Picard
PJB

For Directions Hearing
Gary James Harper
Joseph Cohen Rogers
Gerrard Enes Berberovic
Asador Hinsta

For Plea
Nathan Henry John Riley
Michael Samuel Charlesworth
Alexandra Rose Lockwood

2.15pm For Sentence
Adrian Robert Wickham
Nathaneal Andrew David Wilson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Civil Jurisdiction

In Court
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Narelle Willcocks v. Djaan Heathcote

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.00 a.m. For Trial (Part-Heard)
Cyrus Francis Halfacre
Guthrie Gene Halfacre

10.00 a.m. For Remand
Luke Samuel Dolega
Taylor Maree Cox
Damien Joshua Cruse
JCA

Disputed Facts Hearing
Peter Mervyn Munday

Bail Consent Letter
Timothy Robert Jones
Joseph Daniel Draper

2.15 p.m. For Remand
Darrel Francis Saward

For Application (Part-Heard)
Zachary Alexander Swan

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is set to hear a variety of cases, ranging from civil to criminal matters, on Thursday, 13 December 2012. The court sessions are scheduled at various times throughout the day, with several cases requiring sentence, plea, and bail hearings. One notable case pertains to Matthew Paul Francis versus Richard Lane, which is scheduled for judgment by video link from Burnie. The court is also set to hear cases involving appeals against tribunal and council decisions, such as Gen 3 Development Pty Ltd versus Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal and Devonport City Council. Additionally, the court will consider a case involving West Tamar Council versus Tasmanian Planning Commission.

The legal issues that the court will need to address encompass a wide range of matters, including sentencing, bail applications, and the admissibility of evidence in criminal cases. In the civil domain, the court will need to decide on appeals against tribunal and council decisions, as well as disputes involving planning and development. The court will also need to consider cases involving contractual and tortious claims, such as the case of Matthew Paul Francis versus Richard Lane. The court will need to consider the relevant legal principles and apply them to the facts of each case to reach a just and fair outcome.

The court's reasoning and outcome will depend on the specific facts and legal issues of each case. In criminal cases, the court will need to consider the severity of the offence, the offender's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In civil cases, the court will need to consider the merits of the arguments presented by each party and apply the relevant legal principles to reach a decision. The court will also need to consider the impact of any relevant legislation or precedent on the outcome of each case. Ultimately, the court's goal will be to deliver a fair and just outcome that is in line with the law and the interests of justice.

The final orders of the court will depend on the outcome of each case. In criminal cases, the court may impose a sentence, order bail, or make other relevant orders. In civil cases, the court may make a declaration, order damages, or make other relevant orders. The court may also make orders for costs, depending on the circumstances of each case. The final orders of the court will be communicated to the parties involved and will be subject to any applicable appeals or reviews.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established