SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 12 SEPTEMBER 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Yonnie Judith Kiel
For Plea
Nathan Thomas Charles Howlett
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Carol Anne Devine
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
MDM
SWDM
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m
For Mention
Stuart Malcolm Allen
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
In Chambers
Directions Hearing via telephone
Stobart
v
Stobart and Anor
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Qasair Investments Pty Ltd
v
Alan Quarmby
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
2.15 p.m.
Appoint Representative
Lowth
v
Lowth
4.00 p.m.
Pre Trial Conference by telephone
Arabena
v
Todman
4.30 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
v
Wal’s Bulk Meats Pty Ltd & Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Michael Vernon Lowe
Civil Jurisdiction
In Chambers via telephone
4.00pm For Directions Hearing
In the matter of an application by Joanne Frances Matthews
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 12 September 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 184
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 184
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide a range of legal issues in the cases heard on this day. In the criminal cases, the court needed to determine whether the accused were guilty of the charges brought against them and to impose appropriate sentences if they were found guilty. In the civil cases, the court needed to resolve disputes between the parties and to provide directions for the progress of the cases. The court also needed to consider applications for bail, directions hearings, and pre-trial conferences.
The court's reasoning and outcome in each case varied depending on the specific circumstances. In the criminal cases, the court considered evidence presented by both the prosecution and the defence before reaching a verdict on the guilt or innocence of the accused. In the civil cases, the court considered submissions from both parties and made decisions on issues such as jurisdiction, case management, and the appointment of representatives. In some cases, the court made orders for the parties to take specific steps or to refrain from taking certain actions.
The final orders made by the court varied depending on the outcome of each case. In the criminal cases, the court imposed sentences on the accused if they were found guilty, and in some cases, the court granted bail to the accused pending their trial. In the civil cases, the court made orders for the parties to take specific steps or to refrain from taking certain actions, and in some cases, the court resolved disputes between the parties. The court also made orders for the progress of the cases, including directions hearings and pre-trial conferences.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.